Shown in the figure below are plots of ΔR/R vs time (left ordinate) and the integrated charge, Q, based on the integration of the current (right ordinate), following potential steps between (Eini → Efin) (left panels) and (Efin → Eini) (right panels) for Eini = 0.20 V and Efin = 0.67 (upper panels) and Efin = 0.60 V (lower panels). The ordinates in the two curves in each panel were adjusted so as to match the initial and final values of ΔR/R and Q. It is important to stress is that the measured time constants for both the charge and optical measurements are on the order of a few tenths of seconds, and thus much longer than the RC time constant estimated based on the electrode dimensions and conductivity of the electrolyte (see above), which would yield values on the order a fraction of a ms.
Careful inspection of these curves (as well as those involving all other values of Efin examined, revealed two important features:
- the oxidation process is faster than the subsequent reduction, and, most importantly,
- the rate at which total charge injection and release occurs, as judged by the electrochemical data, appears faster than that at which the Ir sites undergo redox transitions, as evidenced from the optical data. This phenomenon strongly suggests that charge can be stored in the film involving both non-redox (fast) and redox (slow) sites.