Several material additions and electrode configurations have been proposed to overcome these limitations, with the most prominent being the addition of ion exchange membranes (IEMs) promote counter ion flux out of the desalination chamber and incorporation of carbon slurry electrodes to increase system adsorption capacity. Likewise, functionalization of carbon electrodes has been studied to improve counter-ion adsorption within EDL micropores. While the incorporation of functionalized carbon, IEMs in membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI), and the use of slurry electrodes in flow capacitive deionization (FCDI) have successfully reduced energy consumption or increased ion adsorption capacity in CDI systems, these modifications are often evaluated under limited conditions on the basis of specific performance enhancements. Additional clarity is necessary to evaluate the associated performance and cost tradeoffs across the design space.
In this study, an equivalent circuit (M)CDI model, with porous electrode sub-models, was used to measure the sensitivity of CDI performance to material selection, design, and operating choices. In order to investigate the performance of FCDI, pulse-flowed electrodes of high capacity and electronic resistances were incorporated into the existing model. Similarly, fixed charge in the anodic and cathodic micropores was studied to investigate functionalized carbon. Constrained system parameters were randomly selected via latin hypercube sampling (LHS) across multiple electrode geometries and influent salt concentrations. The resultant model outputs were then correlated with input values to quantify parameter sensitivity. Our sensitivity analysis shows that operating current density, electrode specific capacitance, and contact resistance were the parameters which most significantly dictated (M)CDI performance. These parameters where then used to construct an operational space for CDI, MCDI, and FCDI.
The results of our operational space were then used to develop a simplified, operational model for both capacitive and faradic materials in CDI. Using this model we conducted a techno-economic analysis (TEA) of proposed improvement to CDI. From the TEA we are able more directly set operating parameters under which CDI might favorably compete with the primary technology for desalination, reverse osmosis (RO). We are able to evaluate materials lifetimes and costs necessary to economically operate CDI. Lastly, goals for operating parameters highlighted in the sensitivity analysis (specific capacitance, voltage limits, charge efficiency, and cell resistance) were set. These benchmarks will provide target for the continued development of CDI towards and economic and viable alternative to RO for brackish water desalination.