The oxidation reaction mechanism (ORM) on the anodic catalyst in the fuel cell is very important for the development of DEFCs. In the literature are proposed several reaction mechanisms on different catalytic surfaces based on the mixture Pt-M, the problem in these proposed reaction mechanisms is that the whole identification of all the intermediates on each specific Pt based catalyst and the reaction paths involved in the complex process of the ethanol reaction on a catalytic surface is really difficult [5-8]. Currently the main steps identified in different investigations in several Pt based catalysts are in general: the ethanol adsorption, the alcohol decomposition, carbon monoxide (CO) adsorption (catalyst poisoning), the complete oxidation of the CO toward CO2 and the formation of different intermediates (acetaldehyde, acetic acid, water and others) [9-14].
To contribute to clarify the problem of selectivity in catalysts for DEFCs, the potential energy surface (PES) of the adsorption and dehydrogenation steps of the ethanol decomposition on a specific catalytic surface Pt3Sn1 is investigated in this work, using self-consistent periodic slab calculations based on density functional theory (DFT). This research reveals that ethanol does not have a unique mode of adsorption on this catalytic surface, as well as the dehydrogenation pathway does not only proceed via the ethoxy species formation, but also via the 2-hydroxyethyl species formation. Additionally it is showed that acetaldehyde desorbs in the process of dehydrogenation of ethanol. These results allow understanding in detail the first steps of the ethanol oxidation on a specific catalytic surface Pt3Sn1, which is one of the most utilized catalytic mixtures based on Pt for DEFCs.
1. R. Alcalá, J. Shabaker, G. W. Huber, M. A. Sánchez-Castillo and J. Dumesic. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 2074-2085.
2. V. Pacheco, V. del Colle, R. Batista de Lima, G. Tremiliosi. Electrochim. Acta 52 (2007) 2376-2385.
3. R. Alcalá, M. Mavrikakis and J. Dumesic., J. Catal. 218, (2003) 178-190.
4. C. Hartnig, J. Grimminger, E. Spohr. Electrochim. Acta 52 (2007) 2236-2243.
5. F. Colmati, E. Antolini y E. Gonzalez, J. Power Sources 157, (2006) 98-103.
6. Y. Zhou, PH. Lv, G. CH. Wang. J. Molecular Catalysis A, 258 (2006) 203-215.
7. R. Watwe, B. Spiewak, R. Cortright, J. Dumesic. J. Catalysis 180 (1998) 184-193.
8. M. Janik, M. Neurock, Electrochim. Acta, 52 (2007) 5517-5528.
9. S. Garcı́a-rodrı́guez, T. Herranz, and S. Rojas. “New and Future Developments in Catalysis” Elsevier, (2013) 33-67.
10. A. Brouzgou, A. Podias, and P. Tsiakaras. J. App. Electrochemistry, 43 (2012) 119–136.
11. C. Lamy. Chapter1 n Catalysis for Sustainable Energy Production (2009) 1–46.
12. F. Vigier, C. Coutanceau, F. Hahn, E. Belgsir, and C. Lamy. J. Electroanalytical Chemistry 563 (2004) 81–89.
13. M. H. Shao and R. R. Adzic. Electrochimica Acta, 50 (2005) 2415–2422.
14. R. B. Kutz, B. Braunschweig, P. Mukherjee, R. L. Behrens, D. D. Dlott, and A. Wieckowski. Journal of Catalysis 278 (2011) 181–188.