Crucial transport properties of the membrane such as conductivity and primary ion transference can be evaluated using a one-dimensional model of chemical transport based on NPP with bulk reaction (shown in Figure 1A). We were able to show the process by which the membrane loses its selectivity for the primary ion upon significant depletion in the adjacent aqueous phase, upon which the membrane starts to transport interfering ions. In addition, we can show how limiting behavior and loss of selectivity occurs when the concentration of ions within the membrane are sufficiently polarized, above which point over-limiting current is carried by leaked counter ions such as chloride. Finally, the solutions to this model allows us to obtain critical information on the time-scale of the relevant processes that govern concentration changes.
The dimensions of the ICP region are determined by three different processes, each with different characteristic length-scales: spontaneous convection, forced convection, and three‑dimensional diffusion. To evaluate this, two-dimensional NPP with Navier‑Stokes (Figure 1B-C) and three‑dimensional axisymmetric NPP (Figure 1D-E) were solved for the cases of forced convection and three-dimensional diffusion respectively. Using these models, we were able to determine explicit relationships between variables such as flow rate and electrode dimensions, and the concentration profile of ions throughout the ICP region. In addition, we performed an experimental visualization of the forced convection model using fluorescence imaging of calcium-sensitive dye in a microfluidic channel (Figure 1F).
These results are important not only for chemical modulation devices, but also for dynamic ISM sensors based on chronopotentiometry,6 coulometry,7 and amperometry.8
References
1. Song, Y. A.; Melik, R.; Rabie, A. N.; Ibrahim, A. M. S.; Moses, D.; Tan, A.; Han, J.; Lin, S. J. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 980-986.
2. Zook, J. M.; Buck, R. P.; Langmaier, J.; Lindner, E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 2008‑2015.
3. Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 486-493.
4. Gabrielli, C.; Hemery, P.; Letellier, P.; Masure, M.; Perrot, H.; Rahmi, M. I.; Turmine, M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 570, 275-289.
5. Morf, W. E.; Pretsch, E.; de Rooij, N. F. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2009, 633, 137-145.
6. Ghahraman Afshar, M.; Crespo, G. A.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 8813-8821.
7. Grygolowicz-Pawlak, E.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 4537-4542.
8. Senda, M.; Katano, H.; Yamada, M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1999, 468, 34-41.