For solution processed CIGS and CZTS thin film PVs cells, however, the limiting factors for further enhancement of the conversion efficiency involve the shape, size and grain boundaries of the chromophore films. The film morphology, defects and character of the grain boundaries predetermine the mobility (the loss) of free carriers in the chromophore film resulting in conversion efficiency maximum beyond ~11 % for CZTS materials and multilayer solar cell design [8].
One of the possible solutions how to improve the carrier mobility of semiconducting chalcogenides to the highest possible level is to use hybrid photocells employing a highly ordered TiO2 nanotube film /chromophore interface. However, the major issue to extend the functional range of nanotubes is to coat homogenously tube interiors by semiconducting chalcogenides in order to achieve the best possible contact of both components on their interface. This is especially crucial when high aspect ratio semiconducting TiO2 nanotube arrays are utilized [9, 10] and thus the Atomic Layer Deposition technique becomes beneficial.
The presentation will show initial photo-electrochemical results for anodic TiO2 nanotubes employed as highly ordered electron-conductive supports for host materials coated using ALD with secondary materials to enhance light absorbing capabilities of such hybrid systems. We will focus on all ALD photo-electrochemical devices based on inorganic chalcogenides [11].
References
1. A. Jäger-Waldau, PV Status Report 2013, Joint Research Center, European Commission.
2. M. Konagai, Jap. J. App. Phys. 50 (2011) 030001.
3. P. P. Boix, K. Nonomura, N. Mathews, S. G. Mhaisalkar, Materials Today 17 (2014) 16.
4. B. O´Regan and M. Grätzel, Nature 353 (1991) 737.
5. C. J. Brabec, N. S. Sariciftci, J. C. Hummelen, Adv. Funct. Mater.11 (2001) 15.
6. K. Ramanathan, et al., Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 11 (2003) 225.
7. I. Repins, et al., Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 16 (2008) 235.
8. T. K. Todorov et al., Adv. Energy Mater., 4 (2013) 34.
9. J. M. Macak et al., Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 1-2 (2007) 3.
10. R. Zazpe et al., Langmuir, 32 (2016) 10551.
11. M. Krbal et al., Ms in preparation.