Since the cost of electrolysis-produced hydrogen is dominated by electricity cost, electrolyzers typically operate with high catalyst loadings to avoid durability losses. With a shifting focus toward hydrogen production cost, however, catalyst thrifting and durability become critical. [2, 4] The use of anion exchange membrane (AEM) electrolyzers are an attractive option, with potential durability benefits and an ability to use non-platinum group metal (non-PGM) catalysts in place of platinum and iridium.
This study presents baseline performance in rotating disk electrode half-cell tests, in the hydrogen evolution and oxygen evolution reactions for alkaline electrolytes. PGM and non-PGM catalysts are evaluated, included polished metal electrodes and commercial nanoparticle catalysts, differentiating between surface area and specific activity as the source of mass activity. This work develops testing protocols, and examines the effect of the electrolyte manufacturer, the electrochemical cell, the counter electrode, and contaminants on performance and durability.
Baselined catalysts were also evaluated for durability in alkaline hydrogen and oxygen evolution. While minimal hydroxide evolution losses are expected, durability in the oxygen evolution reaction is critical, to demonstrate a potential benefit to proton exchange membrane-based electrolyzers and to ensure non-PGM stability at elevated anode potentials. The modes of loss under specific testing protocols are presented and evaluated, and compared to performance and durability in single-cell electrolyzers. These types of studies are critical for establishing baseline catalyst performance within the electrocatalysis community.
Figure caption. Summary of mass (red) and specific (blue) exchange current densities in the alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction, with platinum (Pt), Pt-ruthenium (Pt-Ru), palladium (Pd), and nickel (Ni) catalysts evaluated. Dashed blue lines corresponding to the specific activities of metal electrodes (Pt, Pd, Ni lines above respective commercial nanoparticles).
 A. Milbrandt and M. Mann, ed. U. S. Department of Energy, http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/42773.pdf, 2009.
 U. S. Department of Energy, https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review16/2016_amr_h2_at_scale.pdf, 2016.
 P. Denholm, M. O'Connell, G. Brinkman and J. Jorgenson, ed. U. S. Department of Energy, http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/65023.pdf, 2015, vol. NREL/TP-6A20-65023, ch. NREL/TP-6A20-65023.