In this work we have used several different bilayer structures using different dielectrics. In each device the bottom electrode (BE) was 10nm Ti/50nmTiN followed by 1nm Al2O3. The second dielectric layer or the switching layer was a 7-nm HfO2 (R3), HfZrO2 (R4 with Hf:Zr%=50%) or HfAlO2 (R1 with Hf:Al%= 3%) followed by the top electrode (TE) constituting of 8nm Ti/6nm ALD TiN+50nm PVD TiN. In some cases, the top electrode was varied to 2nm ALD TiN/8nm Ti/6nm ALD TiN+50nm PVD TiN (R5) by adding a 2nm ALD TiN layer prior to 8nm Ti. Some devices with HfZrO2 (R2) were subjected to a post deposition anneal (PDA) at 700oC for 60 s. In all cases, to enhance the switching characteristics on the top electrode 8 nm Ti was used as the cap layer material except in the case of R5 where 2nm of ALD TiN was deposited prior to 8 nm of Ti. The use of thin dielectric layer of 1nm Al2O3 was to suppress the sneak-path problem (3) in the low resistance state (RON).
Comparing the variation of switching layer, it was observed that the device with 1nm Al2O3/7nm HfAlO2 (R1) provided the superior average Roff/Ron values and both set and reset power compared to HfO2 (R3), and HfZrO2 (R4) devices. When the HfZrO2 (R4) devices were compared with the identical device with PDA (R2) Ron increased and Roff decreased for the PDA device, reducing the Roff/Ron value. Variation of cap layer to TiN instead of Ti also showed similar Roff/Ronbehavior.
- D. Ielmini, Semicond. Sci. Technol. Vol. 31, 063002, 2016.
- Xiaorong Chen and Jie Feng, Appl. Phys. A, vol. 120, 67 2015
- U. Chand, K-C. Huang, C-Y. Huang, and T-Y. Tseng, IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, vol. 62(11), 3665, 2015