1356
Cyclic Plasma Treatment during ALD Hf1-XZrxO2 Deposition
In this study, for the first time, we examined the performance benefits due to the use of intermediate SPA Ar plasma treatment (DSDS) in the ALD deposition process of Hf1-xZrxO2 with 0%, 31% and 80% Zr/(Hf+Zr) percentages and compared them with the standard deposition process (As_Dep). Zr percentage was varied by precisely controlling the Hf-precursor to Zr-precursor pulse ratio in the ALD cycle. MOSCAPs were formed with TiN as gate material, where ALD Hf1-xZrxO2 was deposited on a SiON interface formed by remote plasma radical flow nitridation of chemically grown oxide on a p-Si substrate. It is observed that, DSDS Hf1-xZrxO2with 80% Zr has the lowest dielectric thickness and interfacial layer thickness as compared to others (Fig. 1(a)). Equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) for different Zr percentages for DSDS and As-Dep processing conditions were also compared.
Effect of SPA Ar plasma and Zr addition on the reliability of ALD Hf1-xZrxO2 were monitored from the flat-band voltage shift due to a constant field stress at E= 27.5 MV/cm in the gate injection mode (Fig. 1(b)). Also, the gate leakage current density, before and after stress for different devices were monitored. When subjected to a constant field stress traps are generated in the gate dielectric and at the Si-IL interface. DSDS Hf1-xZrxO2with 80% Zr showed the lowest initial flat-band voltage shift after the first 20-second stress and the subsequent increase of positive charge formation was observed as the stress continued. Devices with intermediate Ar plasma have reduced gate leakage current density before stress and after 1000s stress, which implies suppression of oxide trap formation due to plasma exposure.
Intermediate Ar plasma exposure to ALD Hf1-xZrxO2with 80% Zr seems to deposit superior dielectric with better EOT downscaling ability and good reliability performance. While Zr addition helps to produce a fine grain microstructure with less oxygen vacancies (2), SPA plasma further helps by reducing contaminants, increasing mass density, and superior bond structure of the film (3).
References
1. K. Tapily et al,ECS Trans., 45 (3) 411-420 (2012).
2. R.I. Hegde, et al, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 074113 (2007)
3. T. Tanimura et al, J. Appl., Phys., 113, 064102 (2013)
4. C. Tian et al, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 24(4), 1421(2006).
5. S. Consiglio et al, ECS Trans., 41, 89 (2011).
6. R.D. Clark et al, ECS Trans., 35(4), 815 (2011).
7. A. Delabie et al, J. Electrochem. Soc.,153, F180 (2006).
Figure 1(a): Dielectric thickness (filled symbols in the left scale) for DSDS and As-Dep gate oxides and interfacial layer (IL) thickness (open symbols in the right scale) for MOSCAPs with DSDS and As-Deposited HfO2 (0% Zr), Hf1-xZrxO2 (31% Zr), and Hf1-xZrxO2 (80% Zr). (All processes used 44 ALD cycles of HfO2/Hf1-xZrxO2 deposition at 2500 C)
Figure 1(b): Flat-band voltage values obtained from Capacitance-Voltage (CV) characteristics for unstressed devices (filled symbols) and after 1000s stress (open symbols) with a constant field stress at E= 27.5 MV/cm in the gate injection mode. (MOSCAPS having HfO2 (0% Zr) are denoted by squares, Hf1-xZrxO2 (31% Zr) are denoted by circles, and Hf1-xZrxO2(80% Zr) are denoted by triangles.)